Canadian Claims Child Porn Laws Are Censorship

FREDERICTON, Canada — A 56-year-old Canadian man could have avoided jail time on child pornography charges this week, but chose instead to defend his actions on the grounds that laws against child pornography amount to government censorship.

As a result, Gordon Hickey will spend the next six months in jail.

Hickey’s attorney, Daniel Watters, made attempts last week to win his client a conditional sentence, which would have allowed Hickey to carry out his incarceration under house arrest rather than in prison.

Judge Graydon Nicholas initially had accepted the plea, but changed his mind when Hickey tried to defend his child porn collection, which included hundreds of digital photographs and more than 60 digital movies.

“I have great reservations about a conditional sentence in this circumstance,” Nicholas said in his ruling. “I think jail has to be the message here.”

According to a pretrial report filed by the district attorney, Hickey likened child pornography legislation to government censorship, even telling probation officers that the practice was a “victimless crime” and that the government should leave him alone.

“Mr. Hickey has absolutely no remorse,” Nicholas said. “It's sad he is of that opinion. How could anyone not be revolted by these photographs?”

Joan Irvine, director of The Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection, agreed heartily with Nicholas’ assessment.

“I can’t believe that this person thinks that any crime against children is victimless,” Irvine told XBiz. “Someone sexually abuses a child while taking these pictures and videos. Someone is making money because of this sexual abuse. These children are damaged for life; they are never the same. Plus, the crime against them is repeated each time someone else sees the pictures. It is so sick that someone is trying to justify such behavior.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

GoFundMe Set Up for Danny Ferretti's Medical Expenses

A GoFundMe campaign has been set up for Fangear founder Danny Ferretti, who requires extensive lung surgery.

Byborg Acquires Cuties AI

Byborg Enterprises has acquired adult artificial intelligence startup Cuties AI.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

New York Assemblyman Proposes Banning the Term 'Sex Work'

Republican New York Assembly Member Brian Maher has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of the term "sex work" in government documents.

Age Verification Watch: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

Creator Networking App 'Plaiir' Launches

Plaiir, a mobile networking app for creators, has officially launched.

Swedish Court Rules LELO Products Do Not Infringe 'Invalid' Satisfyer Patent

A Swedish district court has ruled that a patent filed by Satisfyer parent company EIS GmbH is not valid, and therefore three products from pleasure brand LELO are not in violation.

North Dakota House Committee Questions Anti-Porn 'Public Health Hazard' Claim

The North Dakota House of Representatives Education Committee on Monday amended a resolution that would have recognized pornography as a “public health hazard,” instead replacing that language with a call for further study into whether such a designation is appropriate.

Show More