Registrars Say VeriSign Too Powerful

NEW YORK — Top executives from more than half a dozen registrars have written a letter to ICANN Chairman Vint Cerf asking him to reject a new contract with VeriSign they say would give the registrar too much power and raise prices for Internet addresses.

Specifically, the challenging registrars argue the contract would give VeriSign the right to increase prices by seven percent annually without providing a cost justification and also would essentially strip away safeguards to keep VeriSign from gaining a monopoly over “.com” address registrations.

“We are writing to express our deep concern,” the letter stated. “Even if this is VeriSign’s ‘last and best offer,’ it cannot be ICANN’s.”

Signed by the CEOs and presidents of Tucows, Register.com, Schlund+Partner, Network Solutions, Intercosmos, Melbourne IT, BulkRegister and GoDaddy, the letter goes on to warn Cerf that safeguards are needed to “uphold competition, transparency and accountability” in the registrar market.

With roughly 25 million addresses under their control, the aforementioned companies currently manage an estimated 57 percent of .com domains.

“The agreement harms the Internet community by allowing unjustified price increases in most future years at a time when fees for .com addresses should be decreasing, not rising,” continues the letter. “[It also] changes the ‘presumptive renewal’ provision to deny any competition when the contact ends in 2012, locking in VeriSign as the .com registry operator without the counterbalance of competitive bid process.”

The letter also calls into question a $200 million investment officials at VeriSign claim was spent on the company’s .com infrastructure as part of its contract with ICANN. Though Cert has said he is satisfied that VeriSign did in fact invest that much money, many in the online community doubt the investment was so high.

“[We request] third party verification of the $200 million investments in the .com infrastructure required of VeriSign under the current contract,” the letter states.

ICANN has not yet published a response to the letter.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Age Verification Watch: Patching the Holes

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Pineapple Support to Host Autism Spectrum Support Group

Pineapple Support is hosting a free online support group for performers and creators who are, or suspect they may be, on the autism spectrum.

ImLive Launches Revamped Member Loyalty Program

Cam platform ImLive has revamped its member loyalty program.

GoFundMe Set Up for Danny Ferretti's Medical Expenses

A GoFundMe campaign has been set up for Fangear founder Danny Ferretti, who requires extensive lung surgery.

Byborg Acquires Cuties AI

Byborg Enterprises has acquired adult artificial intelligence startup Cuties AI.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

New York Assemblyman Proposes Banning the Term 'Sex Work'

Republican New York Assembly Member Brian Maher has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of the term "sex work" in government documents.

Age Verification Watch: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

Show More