Republican's Anti-Drag Bill Redefining 'Prurient' Passes Montana House

Republican's Anti-Drag Bill Redefining 'Prurient' Passes Montana House

HELENA, Mont. — The Montana House has endorsed a Republican bill aimed at restricting drag shows, which includes a legal redefinition of the term “prurient” as “having a tendency to excite lustful thoughts.”

As XBIZ has been reporting, codifying a legal definition of “prurient” is crucial to current Republican attempts to revive obscenity prosecutions.

Montana’s House Bill 359 is sponsored by Rep. Braxton Mitchell (R-Columbia Falls), a 22-year-old state legislator aligned with Charlie Kirk’s conservative group, Turning Point U.S.A., and with former President Trump’s MAGA movement. In his two years in office, Mitchell has received press attention for denying the results of the 2020 presidential election; for a controversial, ultimately failed attempt to designate “antifa” as a domestic terrorist group; and for tweeting images of the Proud Boys during the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection.

On Thursday, HB 359 passed a preliminary vote 66-33, along partisan lines with all but one Republican supporting the bill, and was expected to pass the House today before heading to the Montana Senate.

Local station KTVH reported that Mitchell affirmed, “Our Republican caucus believes strongly that there is no such thing as a family-friendly drag show.”

Parts of the bill, which was amended after a House Judiciary Committee hearing earlier this month, replicate language used in more than 20 proposed pieces of legislation sponsored by Republicans across the country, purportedly aiming to “ban drag shows for children.”

A Crucial Redefinition of 'Prurient'

Tennessee’s version of the bill yesterday became the first one to clear both chambers of a state legislature and head to the governor’s desk. However, unlike Montana’s HB 359, Tennessee’s SB0003 — which expands the definition of “obscenity and pornography” to criminalize anyone who “engages in an adult cabaret performance on public property or in a location where the adult cabaret performance could be viewed by a person who is not an adult” and targets “male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest” — does not define the word “prurient.”

House Majority Leader Sue Vinton (R-Billings) also quoted blatantly homophobic and stigmatizing language from the committee hearing, which referred to some LGBTQ+ people as “groomers.”

An attempt by a Democratic representative to replace references to drag with the more general “adult-oriented performances” was opposed by Republicans, who said HB 359 would be weakened if it only prohibited performances “‘intended to appeal’ to a prurient interest,” KTVH reported, noting that the bill’s backers have asserted that “drag performances can’t be separated from sexuality.”

Taking Aim at the 'Miller Test'

Industry attorney Lawrence Walters, of Walters Law Group, explained to XBIZ in 2020 that the word “prurient” is defined in the law as “a shameful or morbid interest in sexuality.” Walters pointed out that obviously, adult businesses take the position that their content “does not involve a shameful or morbid interest in human sexuality, but a healthy one.”

The Nixon-era Supreme Court set the standard for judging obscenity in the 1973 case Miller v. California as, "Whether, to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material … appeals to prurient interest."

This “Miller test” is used by courts all the way up to the United States Supreme Court for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled “obscene” and therefore not protected under the First Amendment.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

GoFundMe Set Up for Danny Ferretti's Medical Expenses

A GoFundMe campaign has been set up for Fangear founder Danny Ferretti, who requires extensive lung surgery.

Byborg Acquires Cuties AI

Byborg Enterprises has acquired adult artificial intelligence startup Cuties AI.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

New York Assemblyman Proposes Banning the Term 'Sex Work'

Republican New York Assembly Member Brian Maher has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of the term "sex work" in government documents.

Age Verification Watch: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

Creator Networking App 'Plaiir' Launches

Plaiir, a mobile networking app for creators, has officially launched.

Swedish Court Rules LELO Products Do Not Infringe 'Invalid' Satisfyer Patent

A Swedish district court has ruled that a patent filed by Satisfyer parent company EIS GmbH is not valid, and therefore three products from pleasure brand LELO are not in violation.

North Dakota House Committee Questions Anti-Porn 'Public Health Hazard' Claim

The North Dakota House of Representatives Education Committee on Monday amended a resolution that would have recognized pornography as a “public health hazard,” instead replacing that language with a call for further study into whether such a designation is appropriate.

Show More