VeriSign Suit Heats Up; ICANN Wants to Dissolve Its Structure

LOS ANGELES — VeriSign Inc. has violated the terms of its .com registry agreement with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers by introducing "value-added" services without following the process for obtaining ICANN approval, according to ICANN in a cross-complaint filing in Los Angeles Superior Court.

In related news, ICANN will end its memorandum of understanding with the U.S. Department of Commerce in 2006 but will remain a nonprofit public benefit corporation, according to ICANN’s strategic plan released Tuesday.

In the court filing, ICANN made the allegations in a cross-complaint after VeriSign accused ICANN of breaching its contract with the registry.

VeriSign has sought to gain “inappropriate financial advantage from its stewardship of the .com and .net registries” through the rollout of fee-based ancillary services that “threaten the secure and stable operation of the .com registry,” according to the complaint.

The court conflict between ICANN and VeriSign comes at a time when ICANN is considering replacing VeriSign as the registry operator for the .net top-level domain.

VeriSign’s current deal with ICANN will expire on June 30, and ICANN is expected to put the contract up for bid by the end of the month.

In the original complaint filed in August, VeriSign contends the contractual agreement it has with ICANN does not disallow services that VeriSign wants to offer.

The company claims these services do not require ICANN approval. ICANN disagrees, and VeriSign contends this costs the company money in delays.

VeriSign wants to reintroduce the controversial Site Finder service, which offers links to possible intended destinations when surfers query for nonexistent domain names. Another is Wait List Service, which recaptures soon-to-expire domain names.

ICANN, in its cross complaint, says that VeriSign violated the registry agreement by failing to follow the agreement’s protocol for obtaining approval of the new registry services.

In addition to seeking judgment that VeriSign's new services violate its original deal, ICANN also seeks a declaration that it is not obligated to renew VeriSign’s .com registry agreement in the event it can demonstrate that VeriSign has violated that agreement by charging higher fees than permitted.

ICANN also seeks judgment that it may terminate the .com registry agreement if VeriSign moves forward with any of the contested services without complying with the procedural requirements of the agreement.

It has also requested the trial court to stay the litigation pending the outcome of an arbitration of similar disputed issues between the parties.

“Because the litigation and the arbitration will resolve the same issues and involve nearly identical agreements, it would be grossly inefficient for the two proceedings to proceed simultaneously,” ICANN said in court documents.

The court will hear ICANN’s request in Verisign vs. the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, No. BC 320763, on Dec. 7.

The ICANN report released Tuesday on dissolving its 1998 memorandum of understanding with the U.S. Department of Commerce appears to reject a single-body structure to overseeing the Internet and all the varied interests.

“This is much more of an international structure that is geared to the globalized economy” of the 21st century, said ICANN CEO Paul Twomey.

Twomey said that ICANN needs to be a multilingual, multitime-zone staff for the up to 40,000 telephone calls and emails the organization receives daily at its offices in Brussels and Marina del Rey, Calif.

With theplan on ICANN’s website, an eight-week public comment runs through Jan. 15. Revisions and the final drafting of ICANN’s strategic plan are set Jan. 15-30, with a second period of public comment Jan. 31-Feb. 11.

The final version will be submitted to the ICANN board in February or March.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Age Verification Watch: Patching the Holes

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Pineapple Support to Host Autism Spectrum Support Group

Pineapple Support is hosting a free online support group for performers and creators who are, or suspect they may be, on the autism spectrum.

ImLive Launches Revamped Member Loyalty Program

Cam platform ImLive has revamped its member loyalty program.

GoFundMe Set Up for Danny Ferretti's Medical Expenses

A GoFundMe campaign has been set up for Fangear founder Danny Ferretti, who requires extensive lung surgery.

Byborg Acquires Cuties AI

Byborg Enterprises has acquired adult artificial intelligence startup Cuties AI.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

New York Assemblyman Proposes Banning the Term 'Sex Work'

Republican New York Assembly Member Brian Maher has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of the term "sex work" in government documents.

Age Verification Watch: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

Show More