Verisign .net Award Prompts Questions

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. – VeriSign, the registrar of .com and .tv domains, has been re-awarded control of the .net extension amid accusations of intimidation and improper procedure.

ICANN announced the renewal in late March, and an independent report by reviewing body Telcordia revealed that VeriSign, which was always the frontrunner in consideratipon because it already owned the name, had narrowly beaten Sentan, Affilias, Denic and Core++.

The Internet’s de-facto governing authority, ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) granted VeriSign (formerly Network Solutions) a six-year renewal on its management of .net, despite concerns from losing bidders that VeriSign had an unfair advantage.

British technology news site TheRegister.com conducted what it termed an “in-depth investigation” of the Telcordia report and said it had found that ICANN had made a number of questionable decisions during the selection process.

According to The Register, ICANN added or altered selection criteria at VeriSign’s request, avoided judging criteria that was potentially detrimental to VeriSign and effectively ignored complaints of bias and incompetence.

Also raising some eyebrows was the fact that VeriSign is currently in litigation over several lawsuits with ICANN and had threatened a lawsuit regarding the .net selection process.

The latter company has publicly said that the court costs related to the VeriSign suits are hindering its business, capping employees’ salaries and freezing new hires.

Various of the losing contenders also pointed out that Telcordia shared board members with current and past incarnations of VeriSign and related companies.

VeriSign and ICANN have both denied impropriety in the renewal of .net, calling all procedures “open and transparent.” Still, each of the unsuccessful bidders as well as ICANN’s At-Large-Advisory-Committee (ALAC) have levied criticisms that Telcordia’s report was “unreasonably evaluated” if not “seriously flawed.”

The renewal takes effect in July and continues to June 30, 2011.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Age Verification Watch: Patching the Holes

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Pineapple Support to Host Autism Spectrum Support Group

Pineapple Support is hosting a free online support group for performers and creators who are, or suspect they may be, on the autism spectrum.

ImLive Launches Revamped Member Loyalty Program

Cam platform ImLive has revamped its member loyalty program.

GoFundMe Set Up for Danny Ferretti's Medical Expenses

A GoFundMe campaign has been set up for Fangear founder Danny Ferretti, who requires extensive lung surgery.

Byborg Acquires Cuties AI

Byborg Enterprises has acquired adult artificial intelligence startup Cuties AI.

Irish Government Releases Report on Sex Work Decriminalization Legislation

The Irish government has released a report reviewing a 2017 law that decriminalized sex work across the country.

Texas Bill Would Require Age Verification for Online Sex Toy Sales

A new bill in the Texas state legislature would require online retailers to implement age verification of purchasers before selling “obscene devices” to anyone in that state.

New York Assemblyman Proposes Banning the Term 'Sex Work'

Republican New York Assembly Member Brian Maher has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of the term "sex work" in government documents.

Age Verification Watch: Michigan Joins the AV Club, Some Laws Just Make No Sense

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Free Speech Groups Back SCOTUS Appeal of Georgia Strip Club Tax

Two civil liberties organizations filed an amicus brief Tuesday supporting a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case involving whether a tax specifically aimed at adult entertainment establishments violates the First Amendment.

Show More