Special Panel Won’t Ax U.S. Internet Obscenity Law

NEW YORK — A special federal panel has rejected an appeal to topple the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which makes it a crime to send obscenity over the Internet to children.

Fetish photographer Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom contended in lawsuit first filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan that the federal law was so broad and vague in its scope that it violated the First Amendment, making it impossible for them to publish to the Internet because they cannot control the forum.

“The decision is a stunner — as much for what it doesn't say as for what it does,” said attorney John Wirenius, who represented Nitke and NCSF, on his weblog late Monday.

Nitke, who specializes in pictures of sadomasochistic sexual behavior, and the NCSF, a Baltimore-based advocacy organization, asked a panel consisting of one federal judge from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and two U.S. District Court judges to find the act unconstitutional. The case was referred to a special panel pursuant to CDA rules.

But the court on Monday said both plaintiffs had provided insufficient evidence in the case. The three-judge panel said that with at least 1.4 million websites that mention bondage, discipline and sadomasochism, it couldn’t determine how much the standards for obscenity differ in communities across the United States.

“Because we decide the case on the basis of the failure of the plaintiffs to establish substantial overbreadth, we need not and do not reach the issues of whether some of the works that plaintiffs present as examples of chilled speech would be protected by the social value prong of the Miller test [Miller vs. California, 413 5 U.S. 15 (1973)], whether current technology would enable plaintiffs to control the locations to which their Internet publications are transmitted,or whether the CDA's two affirmative defenses provide an adequate shield from liability,” the court wrote in Monday’s decision.

As the CDA is written, a communication is obscene if according to each community's standards it appeals to the prurient interest, depicts or describes sexual conduct in an offensive way and lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.

The law requires that those disseminating material on the Internet take reasonable action to restrict access to obscenity through credit cards, debit accounts or adult access codes as proof of age.

Wirenius said that the panel during the two-day bench trial, reaffirmed his legal theory's soundness but rejected the amount of evidence he submitted, while finding it credible.

“I must note that a very able attorney had said to me as early as 2003 that the court had set an impossibly high bar,” Wirenius said. “At the time, I was skeptical; now I think he may have been right.

“It's hard to know how we could have gotten more evidence, as the government represented to the court that it didn't compile such evidence, and the only way to try to generate it would be a multimillion dollar empirical survey — which our expert testified would be unreliable, in any event.”

Nitke, who has exhibited her work for more than 20 years, said she will appeal the ruling.

The case is Nitke vs. Gonzales, No. 01 Civ. 11476.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Strike 3 Holdings Sues Meta for Pirating Vixen Media Group Content to Train AI

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings filed suit in federal court this week, accusing Facebook parent company Meta of copyright infringement and alleging that Meta has extensively pirated VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Pineapple Support, Streamate to Host 'Navigating Grief and Loss' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Streamate are hosting a free online support group to help performers cope with grief and loss.

Friday is Final AV Compliance Deadline in UK

Friday, July 25 marks U.K. media regulator Ofcom’s deadline for user-to-user services such as tube, cam and fan sites to implement its requisite “highly effective age assurance” measures for preventing minors from viewing adult content.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches for May, June

AEBN has released the top search terms for the months of May and June from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Two Texas Bills Restricting Sex Toy Sales Fail to Pass

Two bills aimed at restricting sales of sex toys have failed to pass the Texas state legislature during its 2025 session.

NYC Adult Stores Petition for Rehearing in Zoning Law Case

A group of adult businesses on Tuesday petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit to rehear a case involving a zoning law that could severely limit adult stores’ operations in New York City.

Ofcom Releases Transparency Reporting Guidelines

Ofcom, the U.K. media regulator, has made public its official guidance detailing how online service providers — including adult sites — will be required to publish annual transparency reports on their efforts to protect children from online harms.

New AV Rules Take Effect for Ireland-Based Sites

Ireland’s Online Safety Code came into force Monday, including a provision requiring adult sites headquartered in Ireland to implement age assurance measures beyond self-declaration.

XBIZ Amsterdam Calls on New Startups for 'Spotlight' Program

XBIZ is pleased to announce that its new “Startup Spotlight” programming will make its European premiere at XBIZ Amsterdam 2025, set to take place Sept. 2-5 at the Jakarta Hotel Amsterdam.

Texas Resumes AV Lawsuit Against Aylo Following SCOTUS Decision

A district court judge in Texas has unfrozen the state’s $1.6 million lawsuit against Aylo for allegedly failing to comply with age verification requirements, Bloomberg Law is reporting.

Show More